Homework for October 9th
- If you take a closer look at Gee and IMRaD for similarities there are a few important ones involving discourses. Gee talks a lot about the elements that make up a discourse. The elements of a discourse vary for each one but overall they are based on our acts, beliefs, and sayings. Gee explains it as “What we say, do, and are in using language enacts practices. At the same time, what we say, do, and are would have no meaning unless these practices already existed…language and practices ‘boot strap’ each other into existence in a reciprocal process through time. We cannot have one without the other” (Gee 33). The language for communication is different for each discourse. Within each letter of the IMRaD formula there are many different elements on how to write in scientific formula. Each direction given is a form of language within the discourse of scientific writing. It is a from of communication when you are apart of that discourse, whether you are reading it or writing it. Other discourse professionals, when reading your scientific writing work, will be able to tell how accustomed you are to the discourse of scientific writing. They would know whether you are just faking it or if you are fully involved.
- There are many relations between Gee and Haas, especially when Haas mentions rhetorical reading. Gee’s description of how to enter a discourse suggests that you must have prior knowledge of a certain discourse in order to enter a discourse. You should have some knowledge of the participants, the way they act, and their beliefs. Haas mentions a similar method when you rhetorically read. She mentions the idea of rhetorically framing. “Elements of the rhetorical frame include participants, their relationships and motives, and several layers of context.” (48). These are prior elements that if have prior knowledge of you will be able to understand then contents better. Haas then uses discourses as an example. “When readers approach a discourse situation, they presumably have some knowledge or representation of the participants, including the identity, knowledge, and background of author and intended readers.” (48). Gee and Haas connect on the idea of needing prior knowledge for better success.
- ENG110I
